Bitcoin has a reduced risk of collapse Unlike traditional monies that rely on governments. When currencies collapse, it contributes to hyperinflation or the wipeout of one’s savings in an instant. Bitcoin exchange rate is not controlled by any government and is a digital currency available worldwide.
Bitcoin is easy to carry. A billion Dollars in the Bitcoin can be stored on a memory stick and placed in one’s pocket. It is that simple to transport Bitcoins compared to paper cash.
The general Notion is that Bitcoins Are ‘mined’… interesting expression here… by solving an increasingly difficult mathematical formula -more difficult as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into existence; yet again intriguing- to a computer. Once created, the new Bitcoin is set into a digital ‘wallet’. It’s then possible to trade actual goods or Fiat currency for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Additionally, as there is no central issuer of Bitcoins, it’s all highly dispersed, thus resistant to being ‘handled’ by jurisdiction.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, Those who benefit from the growth of Bitcoin, insist rather loudly that ‘for sure, Bitcoin is cash’… and not only that, but ‘it’s the best money , the money of the future’, etc.. . Well, the proponents of Fiat shout as loudly that paper money is cash… and most of us know that Fiat paper isn’t cash by any means, as it lacks the most important attributes of real money. The issue then is does Bitcoin even qualify as money… never mind it being the money of the future, or the very best money .
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin doesn’t Do too badly as a medium of trade. Fiat is only accepted in the geographical domain of its issuer. Dollars are no great in Europe etc.. Bitcoin is accepted internationally. On the flip side, not many retailers currently accept payment in Bitcoin. Until the approval grows geometrically, Fiat wins… although at the cost of exchange between nations.
The first condition is a great deal Tougher; money has to be a stable store of value… today Bitcoins have gone out of a ‘value’ of $3.00 to about $1,000, in only a few years. This is about as far from being a ‘stable store of value’; as you can buy! Indeed, such profits are an ideal example of a speculative boom… like Dutch tulip bulbs, or real mining companies, or Nortel stocks. Well, what do you feel about that so far? bitcoin revolution is a huge area with many additional sub-topics you can read about. You can find there is much in common with topical areas closely resembling this one.
You never really know about any one aspect because there are a lot of varied situations. Try examining your own unique needs which will help you even more refine what may be necessary. You will discover the rest of this article adds to the groundwork you have built up to this point.
Naturally, Fiat fails as well; For instance, the US Dollar, the ‘primary’ Fiat, has dropped over 95 percent of its worth in a few decades… neither fiat nor Bitcoin qualify in the most important measure of cash; the capacity to store value and conserve value through time. Real money, which is Gold, has shown the ability to maintain value not just for centuries, but for eons. Neither Fiat nor Bitcoin has this critical capacity… both neglect as cash.
Ultimately, we return to the next Attribute; that of being the numeraire. Now this is actually interesting, and we can see why both Bitcoin and Fiat fail as cash, by looking closely at the question of the ‘numeraire’. Numeraire refers to the usage of money to not just save value, but to at a sense step, or compare worth. In Austrian economics, it is deemed impossible to actually measure value; after all, value resides just in human consciousness… and how can anything else in understanding actually be quantified? Nevertheless, through the principle of Mengerian market action, that is interaction between offer and bid, market prices can be established… if only briefly… and this industry price is expressed concerning the numeraire, the most marketable good, that’s money.
So how do we set the value of Fiat… ? Through the concept of ‘buying power’… that is, the worth of Fiat is determined by what it can be exchanged for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. However, his clearly suggests that Fiat has no significance of its own, but instead appreciate flows from the value of the goods and services it might be exchanged for. Causality flows from the goods ‘purchased’ to the Fiat number. After all, what difference is there between a one Dollar bill and a hundred Dollar bill, except the amount printed on it… and the purchasing power of the number?